2002 Sediment Profile Imaging (SPI) Data for Catlett and Goodwin Islands on the York River, Chesapeake Bay, Virginia (Ches_2002SPI)

Office for Coastal Management
Data Set (DS) | ID: 47986 | Published / External
Created: 2017-11-14   |   Last Modified: 2023-05-30

Parent: Benthic
Project (PRJ) | ID: 37225

ID: 47986
Data Set (DS)

* Discovery
• First Pass
» Metadata Rubric

Item Identification

* » Title 2002 Sediment Profile Imaging (SPI) Data for Catlett and Goodwin Islands on the York River, Chesapeake Bay, Virginia (Ches_2002SPI)
Short Name va_yr02_spi-meta
* Status Completed
Creation Date  
Revision Date  
• Publication Date 2005-08-31
* » Abstract

This data set represents the sediment profile imaging data from 2002.In Fall/Winter 2002, researchers from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) and the NOAA Office for Coastal Management conducted a project to map benthic habitats by Catlett and Goodwin Islands on the York River, Chesapeake Bay, Virginia. Sediment grab samples were collected at 56 stations and sediment profile images were collected at 200 stations. Sampling areas were also surveyed using side scan sonar and interferometric swath bathymetry sensors. Scientists from the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences returned to sample a subset of the 2002 sediment grab data in 2003 and then again in 2004. A subset of SPI stations (79) were revisited in 2004.

Original contact information:

Contact Org: NOAA Office for Coastal Management

Phone: 843-740-1202

Email: coastal.info@noaa.gov
* Purpose

VIMS and the NOAA Office for Coastal Management are using the acoustic, grab, and SPI information (collected in 2002, 2003, and 2004) to characterize benthic habitats by Catlett and Goodwin Islands on the York River. Sediment profile images (SPI) of the sediment-water interface were collected using a sediment profile camera at pre-determined locations at both sites.
Notes

10141
Other Citation Details
• Supplemental Information

Nilsson, H.C. and R. Rosenberg. 1997. "Benthic Habitat Quality Assessment of an Oxygen Stressed Fjord by Surface and Sediment Profile Images." Journal of Marine Systems. Volume 11. Pages 249 to 264.
DOI (Digital Object Identifier)  
DOI Registration Authority  
DOI Issue Date  

Keywords

Theme Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > BENTHIC
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > COASTAL
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > ESTUARY
ISO 19115 Topic Category biota
ISO 19115 Topic Category environment
None benthic data
None Environmental Monitoring
None geographic information systems
None GIS
None OCM Benthic Habitat Mapping
None sediment profile imaging
None SPI
   
   
   

Temporal Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
None 2002
   
   
   

* Spatial Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > VIRGINIA
None Catlett Island
None Chesapeake Bay
None Goodwin Island
None Virginia
None York River
   
   
   

Stratum Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
   
   
   

Instrument Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
   
   
   

Platform Keywords

Thesaurus Keyword
   
   
   

Physical Location

• » Organization Office for Coastal Management
• » City Charleston
• » State/Province SC
• Country  
• » Location Description

Data Set Information

* Data Set Scope Code Data Set
• Data Set Type  
• Maintenance Frequency None Planned
Maintenance Note
» Data Presentation Form Map (digital)
• Entity Attribute Overview

Values of 99.0 for SFC_RELIEF, RPD, ADJ_RPD, BHQ, and ADJ_BHQ fields represent unknown values.
Entity Attribute Detail Citation

NOAA Office for Coastal Management
Entity Attribute Detail URL  
Distribution Liability

While every effort has been made to ensure that these data are accurate and reliable within limits of the state of the art, NOAA will not assume any liability for damages caused by any inaccuracies in these data, or failure in their use.
Data Set Credit  

Support Roles

» At least one Distributor Org, one Metadata Contact, one Point of Contact, and one Data Steward should be listed.
* » Support Role Data Steward
* » Date Effective From 2005-08-31
Date Effective To
Organization NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
Address 2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston, SC 29405-2413
Email Address coastal.info@noaa.gov
Phone (843) 740-1202
Fax  
Mobile  
URL https://coast.noaa.gov
Business Hours  
Contact Instructions
* » Support Role Distributor
* » Date Effective From 2005-08-31
Date Effective To
Organization NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
Address 2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston, SC 29405-2413
Email Address coastal.info@noaa.gov
Phone (843) 740-1202
Fax  
Mobile  
URL https://coast.noaa.gov
Business Hours  
Contact Instructions
* » Support Role Metadata Contact
* » Date Effective From 2005-08-31
Date Effective To
Organization NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
Address 2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston, SC 29405-2413
Email Address coastal.info@noaa.gov
Phone (843) 740-1202
Fax  
Mobile  
URL https://coast.noaa.gov
Business Hours  
Contact Instructions
* » Support Role Point of Contact
* » Date Effective From 2005-08-31
Date Effective To
Organization NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
Address 2234 South Hobson Ave
Charleston, SC 29405-2413
Email Address coastal.info@noaa.gov
Phone (843) 740-1202
Fax  
Mobile  
URL https://coast.noaa.gov
Business Hours  
Contact Instructions
* » Support Role
* » Date Effective From
Date Effective To
* » Contact
* Contact Instructions
* » Support Role
* » Date Effective From
Date Effective To
* » Contact
* Contact Instructions
* » Support Role
* » Date Effective From
Date Effective To
* » Contact
* Contact Instructions

Extents

Currentness Reference Ground Condition

Extent Group 1

Extent Description

Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1

* » W° Bound -76.58
* » E° Bound -76.3667
* » N° Bound 37.304
* » S° Bound 37.2027
* » Description

Extent Group 1 / Vertical Extent

EPSG Code
Vertical Minimum
Vertical Maximum

Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1

* » Time Frame Type Discrete
* » Start 2002-12-02
End  
Alternate Start As Of Info  
Alternate End As Of Info  
Description

Spatial Information

Spatial Resolution

Angular Distance  
Angular Distance Units  
Horizontal Distance  
Horizontal Distance Units  
Vertical Distance  
Vertical Distance Units  
Equivalent Scale Denominator  
Level of Detail Description

Spatial Representation

Grid Representation Used?  
Vector Representation Used? Yes
Text / Table Representation Used?  
TIN Representation Used?  
Stereo Model Representation Used?  
Video Representation Used?  

Grid Representation

Dimension Count
Cell Geometry
Transformation Parameter Available?  

Axis Dimension
Dimension Type
Size
Resolution
Resolution Units
Resolution Type
Description

Axis Dimension
Dimension Type
Size
Resolution
Resolution Units
Resolution Type
Description

Vector Representation

Topology Level  
Complex Object Present?  
Complex Object Count  
Composite Object Present?  
Composite Object Count  
Curve Object Present?  
Curve Object Count  
Point Object Present? Yes
Point Object Count 199
Solid Object Present?  
Solid Object Count  
Surface Object Present?  
Surface Object Count  

Vector Representation

Topology Level
Complex Object Present?  
Complex Object Count
Composite Object Present?  
Composite Object Count
Curve Object Present?  
Curve Object Count
Point Object Present?  
Point Object Count
Solid Object Present?  
Solid Object Count
Surface Object Present?  
Surface Object Count

Reference Systems

Reference System

EPSG Code

Horizontal Resolution
Horizontal Encoding Method
Latitude Resolution
Longitude Resolution
Coordinate X Resolution
Coordinate Y Resolution
Row Resolution
Column Resolution
Horizontal Units
Distance Resolution
Distance Units
Bearing Resolution
Bearing Units
Reference Direction
Reference Meridian

Vertical Resolution
Vertical Encoding Method
Vertical Resolution
Vertical Units

Access Information

Data License  
Data License URL  
Data License Statement
* » Security Class Unclassified
* Security Classification System
Security Handling Description
• Data Access Policy
» Data Access Procedure
• » Data Access Constraints

None
• Data Use Constraints

These data should be used for resource mapping and comparison purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure that these data are accurate and reliable within limits of the state of the art, NOAA will not assume any liability for damages caused by any inaccuracies in these data, or failure in their use.
Metadata Access Constraints
Metadata Use Constraints

Distribution Information

Start Date  
» Download URL ftp://ftp.coast.noaa.gov/pub/benthic/Sediment_Profile_Imaging_Data/VA_YorkRiver_spi.zip
Distributor
File Name Bulk Download
Description

FTP download of data files.
File Date/Time  
File Type (Deprecated)  
Distribution Format  
File Size  
Application Version  
Compression  
Review Status  
Start Date
End Date
» Download URL
Distributor
File Name
Description
File Date/Time
File Type
FGDC Content Type
File Size
Application Version
Compression
Review Status
Start Date
End Date
» Download URL
Distributor
File Name
Description
File Date/Time
File Type
FGDC Content Type
File Size
Application Version
Compression
Review Status
Start Date
End Date
» Download URL
Distributor
File Name
Description
File Date/Time
File Type
FGDC Content Type
File Size
Application Version
Compression
Review Status

Archive Information

Location
File Identifier
File Name
URL
Description
DOI
Archive Date
Archive Update Frequency
Location
File Identifier
File Name
URL
Description
DOI
Archive Date
Archive Update Frequency
Location
File Identifier
File Name
URL
Description
DOI
Archive Date
Archive Update Frequency

URLs

URL https://coast.noaa.gov/
Name NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) website
URL Type Online Resource
File Resource Format  
Description

Information on the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM)
URL
Name
URL Type
File Resource Format
Description
URL
Name
URL Type
File Resource Format
Description
URL
Name
URL Type
File Resource Format
Description

Activity Log

Activity Time 2017-03-30
Activity Type  
Responsible Party  
Description

Date that the source FGDC record was last modified.
Activity Time 2017-11-14
Activity Type  
Responsible Party  
Description

Converted from FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using 'fgdc_to_inport_xml.pl' script. Contact Tyler Christensen (NOS) for details.
Activity Time 2018-02-08
Activity Type  
Responsible Party  
Description

Partial upload of Positional Accuracy fields only.
Activity Time 2018-04-11
Activity Type  
Responsible Party  
Description

Partial upload to move data access FTP links to Distribution Info and remove broken URLs.
Activity Time
Activity Type
Responsible Party
Description
Activity Time
Activity Type
Responsible Party
Description
Activity Time
Activity Type
Responsible Party
Description

Issues

Issue Date
Author
Issue
Issue Date
Author
Issue
Issue Date
Author
Issue

Technical Environment

Description

Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 2; ESRI ArcCatalog 8.3.0.800

Data Quality

Representativeness
Accuracy

The attribute accuracy was verified by checking the compiled SPI database against the actual photos for each station. Since two photos were taken at each station, attributes from both images were noted in the database, and one image was digitized and analyzed using image analysis software. The results of this automated analysis were also used to check the accuracy of the dataset. When large disagreement occurred between images from a single station, all attributes were recorded and the image with the largest visible area was digitized.
Analytical Accuracy
Horizontal Positional Accuracy

Stations were located in the field using a differential Global Positioning System (GPS), and station coordinates, date and time of day were recorded upon arrival at each station.
Vertical Positional Accuracy

Not relevant to the data set.
Quantitation Limits
Bias
Comparability
Completeness Measure
Precision
Analytical Precision
Field Precision
Sensitivity
Detection Limit
Completeness Report

All SPI data were included in this data layer.
Conceptual Consistency

All data are believed to be logically consistent.
» Quality Control Procedures Employed

Data Management

» Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified?  
» Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management  
» Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive?  
» Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver?  
» If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate  
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination  
» If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed  
 
» Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location  
» If World Data Center or Other, Specify  
» If To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended, Explain  
 
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving  
» How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive?  
 

Lineage

» Lineage Statement

Sources

Citation Title
Contact Role Type
Contact Type
Contact Name
Publish Date
Extent Type
Extent Start Date/Time
Extent End Date/Time
Citation URL
Citation URL Name
Citation URL Description
Scale Denominator
Citation Title
Contact Role Type
Contact Type
Contact Name
Publish Date
Extent Type
Extent Start Date/Time
Extent End Date/Time
Citation URL
Citation URL Name
Citation URL Description
Scale Denominator
Citation Title
Contact Role Type
Contact Type
Contact Name
Publish Date
Extent Type
Extent Start Date/Time
Extent End Date/Time
Citation URL
Citation URL Name
Citation URL Description
Scale Denominator

Process Steps

Process Step Number 1
» Description

SPI images were collected on December 12, 2002 at a total of 200 stations. A Hulcher model sediment profile camera was deployed with a modified frame that was lightened for use from a small vessel. Fujichrome 100 ASA professional color slide film was used. Tests were done frequently onboard in order to ensure camera function and mark stations.Laboratory Methods: All sediment images were analyzed visually by projecting the images and recording all features seen into a preformatted standardized spreadsheet file. Images were then digitized using a Nikon LS2000 scanner and analyzed using the Adobe PhotoShop and NTIS Image programs. Steps in the computer analysis of each image were standardized and followed the basic procedures in Viles and Diaz (1991). Data from each image were sequentially saved to a spread sheet file for later analysis. Details of how these data were obtained can be found in Diaz and Schaffner (1988) and Rhoads and Germano (1986). References: 1) Viles, C. and R.J. Diaz. 1991. Bencore, an image analysis system for measuring sediment profile camera slides. School of Marine Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Pt. VA. 13 pp. 2) Diaz, R.J. and L.C. Schaffner. 1988. Comparison of sediment landscapes in the Chesapeake Bay as seen by surface and profile imaging. p. 222 240. In: M. P. Lynch and E. C. Krome, eds. Understanding the estuary; Advances in Chesapeake Bay research. Chesapeake Res. Consort. Pub. 129, CBP/TRS 24/88. 3) Rhoads, D.C. and J.D. Germano. 1986. Interpreting long-term changes in benthic community structure: a new protocol. Hydrobiologia 142:291-308.
Process Date/Time 2002-01-01 00:00:00
Process Contact  
Phone (Voice)  
Email Address  
Source  
Process Step Number 2
» Description

Data from field samples was entered into an Access database. A query was developed to review SPI data from all SPI stations. A shapefile was created using ESRI ArcMap 8.3.
Process Date/Time 2005-07-19 00:00:00
Process Contact  
Phone (Voice)  
Email Address  
Source  
Process Step Number
» Description
Process Date/Time
Process Contact
Phone (Voice)
Email Address
Source
Process Step Number
» Description
Process Date/Time
Process Contact
Phone (Voice)
Email Address
Source
Process Step Number
» Description
Process Date/Time
Process Contact
Phone (Voice)
Email Address
Source

Acquisition Information

Instruments

Instrument Unavailable Reason  
Identifier
Docucomp UUID
Instrument / Gear
Instrument Type
Description
Identifier
Docucomp UUID
Instrument / Gear
Instrument Type
Description
Identifier
Docucomp UUID
Instrument / Gear
Instrument Type
Description

Platforms

Platform Unavailable Reason  
Identifier
Docucomp UUID
Description

Mounted Instruments
Identifier  
Identifier  
Identifier  
Identifier
Docucomp UUID
Description

Mounted Instruments
Identifier  
Identifier  
Identifier  
Identifier
Docucomp UUID
Description

Mounted Instruments
Identifier  
Identifier  
Identifier  

FAQs

Date
Author
Question
Answer

Child Items

Rubric scores updated every 15m

Score Type Title
  Entity (ENT) Ches_2002SPI.dbf
     
     
     

Related Items

Item Type Relationship Type Title
     
     
     

Catalog Details

Catalog Item ID 47986
Metadata Record Created By Anne Ball
Metadata Record Created 2017-11-14 12:58+0000
Metadata Record Last Modified By SysAdmin InPortAdmin
» Metadata Record Last Modified 2023-05-30 18:09+0000
Metadata Record Published 2018-04-11
Owner Org OCM
Metadata Publication Status Published Externally
Do Not Publish? N
Metadata Workflow State Published / External
Metadata Last Review Date 2018-04-11
Metadata Review Frequency 1 Year
Metadata Next Review Date 2019-04-11
Tags