2013 OLC Lidar DEM: West Ochoco, OR
OCM Partners
Data Set
(DS)
| ID: 57383
| Published / External
Created: 2019-09-10
|
Last Modified: 2024-01-10
Project (PRJ) | ID: 49404
ID: 57383
Data Set (DS)
* Discovery• First Pass
» Metadata Rubric
Item Identification
* » Title | 2013 OLC Lidar DEM: West Ochoco, OR |
---|---|
Short Name | 2013 West Ochoco DEM m8858 |
* Status | Completed |
Creation Date | |
Revision Date | |
• Publication Date | 2019-09-10 |
* » Abstract |
The dataset encompasses 474 square miles in the Ochoco National Forest of Oregon, including portions of Crook, Jefferson, and Wheeler Counties, Oregon. The highest hit digital surface models (DSM) represent the earth's surface with all vegetation and human-made structures included. The DSMs represent the earth's surface with all vegetation and human-made structures included. The highest hit DSMs were derived from lidar data using the highest hit method. The bare earth digital elevation model (DEM) represents the earth's surface with all vegetation and human-made structures removed. The bare earth DEMs were derived from lidar data using TIN processing of the ground point returns. The DSM and DEM grid cell size is 3 international feet. The elevation units are in international feet. Some elevation values have been interpolated across areas in the models where there is no elevation data (e.g. over water, over dense vegetation). Watershed Sciences, Inc. |
* Purpose |
This dataset provides high resolution terrain elevation and land cover elevation data in the Ochoco West study area. |
Notes | |
Other Citation Details | |
• Supplemental Information | |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) | |
DOI Registration Authority | |
DOI Issue Date |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords | EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION |
ISO 19115 Topic Category | elevation |
None | DEM |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
* Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > OREGON |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE |
Stratum Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords | LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging |
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords | Airplane > Airplane |
Physical Location
• » Organization | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
• » City | Charleston |
• » State/Province | SC |
• Country | |
• » Location Description |
Data Set Information
* Data Set Scope Code | Data Set |
---|---|
• Data Set Type | Elevation |
• Maintenance Frequency | None Planned |
Maintenance Note | |
» Data Presentation Form | Model (digital) |
• Entity Attribute Overview |
xyz location information for objects in the area |
Entity Attribute Detail Citation | |
Entity Attribute Detail URL | |
Distribution Liability |
This dataset was contracted by Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI). Information regarding the use of this dataset should be directed to the owner. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners |
Data Set Credit | Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries; Watershed Sciences, Inc |
Support Roles
* » Support Role | Data Steward |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2019 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Distributor |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2019 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Metadata Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2019 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Point of Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2019 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
Extents
Currentness Reference | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Description |
---|
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -120.50945 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -119.85479 |
* » N° Bound | 44.564071 |
* » S° Bound | 44.188146 |
* » Description |
Ochoco project area, OR |
Extent Group 1 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2013-05-20 |
End | 2013-06-16 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Collection time for the lidar. |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
Angular Distance | |
---|---|
Angular Distance Units | |
Horizontal Distance | 0.35 |
Horizontal Distance Units | Meter |
Vertical Distance | |
Vertical Distance Units | |
Equivalent Scale Denominator | |
Level of Detail Description |
Spatial Representation
Grid Representation Used? | Yes |
---|---|
Vector Representation Used? | |
Text / Table Representation Used? | |
TIN Representation Used? | |
Stereo Model Representation Used? | |
Video Representation Used? |
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | 1 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | Point | ||||||||||||
Transformation Parameters Available? | Yes | ||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | |||||||||||||
Transformation Parameter Available? | |||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Vector Representation
Topology Level | |
---|---|
Complex Object Present? | |
Complex Object Count | |
Composite Object Present? | |
Composite Object Count | |
Curve Object Present? | |
Curve Object Count | |
Point Object Present? | |
Point Object Count | |
Solid Object Present? | |
Solid Object Count | |
Surface Object Present? | |
Surface Object Count |
Reference Systems
Reference System
EPSG Code | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Data License | |
---|---|
Data License URL | |
Data License Statement | |
* » Security Class | Unclassified |
* Security Classification System | |
Security Handling Description | |
• Data Access Policy | |
» Data Access Procedure |
Data is available online for custom downloads |
• » Data Access Constraints |
None |
• Data Use Constraints |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Metadata Access Constraints | |
Metadata Use Constraints |
Distribution Information
Start Date | 2019-09-10 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/OLC_West_Ochoco_OR_2013_8858/index.html |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2019 - Present) |
File Name | Bulk Download |
Description |
Bulk download of GeoTiff files |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | GeoTIFF |
Distribution Format | GeoTIFF |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | 2019-08-29 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8858 |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2019 - Present) |
File Name | Customized Download |
Description |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | Zip |
Distribution Format | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Zip |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Archive Information
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
URLs
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | HTML |
Description |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8857/supplemental/2013_west_ochoco_area_m8857.kmz |
---|---|
Name | Browse graphic |
URL Type | Browse Graphic |
File Resource Format | KML |
Description |
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8857/supplemental/2013_OLC_Ochoco_West_Acceptance_Report.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Acceptance and QA report |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Report by DOGAMI describing data quality tests and results. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8857/supplemental/OLC_Ochoco_West_2013_Survey_Report.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Survey Report |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Report by Watershed Sciences Inc detailing the project and processes. |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Activity Log
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Issues
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Technical Environment
Description |
|
---|
Data Quality
Representativeness | |
---|---|
Accuracy | |
Analytical Accuracy | |
Horizontal Positional Accuracy | |
Vertical Positional Accuracy |
Vertical accuracy compares the delivered bare-earth digital elevation models (DEMS) with independent ground check points (GCPs) collected by DOGAMI staff. These variations in elevation values were used to produce a mean vertical error and vertical root mean square error (RMSE) value for the entire delivered data set. Project specifications list the maximum acceptable mean vertical offset to be 0.20 meters (0.65 feet) and the maximum vertical RSME to not exceed 0.0925 meters (0.303 feet). A total of 4,400 independently measured GCPs were obtained in the OLC Ochoco West project area. The data delivered to DOGAMI was found to have a mean vertical offset of 0.005 meters (0.017 feet) and an RMSE value of 0.047 meters (0.154 feet). |
Quantitation Limits | |
Bias | |
Comparability | |
Completeness Measure |
100% |
Precision | |
Analytical Precision | |
Field Precision | |
Sensitivity | |
Detection Limit | |
Completeness Report |
DOGAMI examines all data associated with this delivery to ensure that all required data products are present and function correctly. Quality control review is conducted on every data file delivered to DOGAMI. Lidar ASCII Standard (LAS) point files have been loaded into TerraSolid and ArcGIS to ensure complete and correct lidar data coverage and file integrity. Raster and vector files have been viewed in ArcMap and cross referenced with the delivery area to ensure proper coverage, extent and integrity. Metadata content is reviewed by using a visual check as well as analysis by the USGS Geospatial Metadata validation service. |
Conceptual Consistency |
Consistency Analysis: Consistency refers to lidar elevation differences between overlapping flight lines. Consistency errors are created by poor lidar system calibration settings associated with sensor platform mounting. Errors in consistency manifest as vertical offsets between individual flight lines. Lidar flight lines have been examined to ensure that there was at least 60% sidelap, there are no gaps between flightlines, and the vertical offsets between flight line must be less than 0.15m (0.49 feet). Consistency offsets were measured using the 'Find Match' tool within the TerraMatch software toolset. This tool uses aircraft trajectory information linked to the lidar point cloud to quantify flight line-to-flight line offsets. To quantify the magnitude of this error 2,278 delivered data tiles were examined for vertical offset between flight lines. Data tiles with less than 1000 points were not used in analysis. Selection of tiles aimed to evenly sample the delivered spatial extent of data. Each tile measured 750 x 750 meters in size. Within each tile, we selected all ground classified points from each flight line, and compared the elevations of the points in each set of overlapping lines. The average number of points used for flight line comparison was 16,314,783 per tile. Error measurements were calculated by differencing the nearest point from an adjacent flight line within 1 meter in the horizontal plane and 0.2 meters in the vertical plane. Each flight line was compared to adjacent flight lines, and the average magnitude of vertical error was calculated. A total of 401 flight lines were sampled and compared for consistency. Results of the consistency analysis found the average flight line offset to be 0.03 meters with a maximum error of 0.039. Distribution of error showed 100% of all error was less than 0.04m. These results show that all data are within tolerances of data consistency according to contract agreement. |
» Quality Control Procedures Employed |
Data Management
» Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified? | Yes |
---|---|
» Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management | Unknown |
» Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive? | Yes |
» Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver? | |
» If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate | |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination | |
» If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed | |
» Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location | NCEI-CO |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving | |
» How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive? |
Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage. |
Lineage
» Lineage Statement |
Watershed Sciences Inc. has collected Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data in the Ochoco West Study Area for the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI). NOAA OCM has taken the data and ingested it into the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer for distribution. |
---|
Sources
Citation Title | processed lidar data |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | Originator |
Contact Type | Organization |
Contact Name | Watershed Sciences, Inc |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Citation Title | raw lidar data |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | Originator |
Contact Type | Organization |
Contact Name | Watershed Sciences, Inc |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Process Steps
Process Step Number | 1 |
---|---|
» Description |
Acquisition. LiDAR data acquisition occured on May 20, 2013 and from June 5 to June 16, 2013. The survey utilized an ALS60 laser system mounted in a Cessna Caravan 208B. Near nadir scan angles were used to increase penetration of vegetation to ground surfaces. Ground level GPS and aircraft IMU were collected during the flight. |
Process Date/Time | 2013-06-16 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 2 |
---|---|
» Description |
Processing. 1. Flight lines and data were reviewed to ensure complete coverage of the study area and positional accuracy of the laser points. 2. Laser point return coordinates were computed using ALS Post Processor software and IPAS Pro GPS/INS software, based on independent data from the LiDAR system, IMU, and aircraft. 3. The raw LiDAR file was assembled into flight lines per return with each point having an associated x, y, and z coordinate. 4. Visual inspection of swath to swath laser point consistencies within the study area were used to perform manual refinements of system alignment. 5. Custom algorithms were designed to evaluate points between adjacent flight lines. Automated system alignment was computed based upon randomly selected swath to swath accuracy measurements that consider elevation, slope, and intensities. Specifically, refinement in the combination of system pitch, roll and yaw offset parameters optimize internal consistency. 6. Noise (e.g., pits and birds) was filtered using ALS postprocessing software, based on known elevation ranges and included the removal of any cycle slips. 7. Using TerraScan and Microstation, ground classifications utilized custom settings appropriate to the study area. 8. The corrected and filtered return points were compared to the RTK ground survey points collected to verify the vertical and horizontal accuracies. 9. Points were output as laser points, TINed and GRIDed surfaces. |
Process Date/Time | 2013-07-31 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source | raw lidar data |
Process Step Number | 3 |
---|---|
» Description |
NOAA/OCM received the data from DOGAMI in Arc Grid format . Data were in NAD83(2011) Oregon Lambert horizontally and NAVD88 (Geoid12a) vertically. All units were international feet. For ingest into the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer and adhere to the Open Data Policy, data were converted to GeoTiff format. |
Process Date/Time | 2019-09-10 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Phone (Voice) | (843) 740-1202 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Source | processed lidar data |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Acquisition Information
Instruments
Instrument Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Platforms
Platform Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
FAQs
Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Question | |
Answer |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
Score | Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Data Set (DS) | Cross Reference |
2013 OLC Lidar: West Ochoco, OR Point cloud used to derive this DEM. |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID | 57383 |
---|---|
Metadata Record Created By | Kirk Waters |
Metadata Record Created | 2019-09-10 08:00+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By | Kirk Waters |
» Metadata Record Last Modified | 2024-01-10 19:07+0000 |
Metadata Record Published | 2024-01-10 |
Owner Org | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish? | N |
Metadata Workflow State | Published / External |
Metadata Last Review Date | 2022-03-16 |
Metadata Review Frequency | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date | 2023-03-16 |
Tags |
---|