2016 - 2017 FEMA Lidar DEM: Franklin and St. Lawrence Counties and Oneida Sub-Basin, NY
OCM Partners
Data Set
(DS)
| ID: 64733
| Published / External
Created: 2021-06-04
|
Last Modified: 2024-01-10
Project (PRJ) | ID: 49404
ID: 64733
Data Set (DS)
* Discovery• First Pass
» Metadata Rubric
Item Identification
* » Title | 2016 - 2017 FEMA Lidar DEM: Franklin and St. Lawrence Counties and Oneida Sub-Basin, NY |
---|---|
Short Name | ny2017_frank_st_lawr_dem_m9315_metadata |
* Status | Completed |
Creation Date | |
Revision Date | |
• Publication Date | 2017-10-13 |
* » Abstract |
Product: These are Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data for Franklin, Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, and St. Lawrence Counties, New York as part of the required deliverables for the New York 2016 Lidar project. Class 2 (ground) lidar points in conjunction with the hydro breaklines were used to create a 1-meter hydro-flattened raster DEM. Geographic Extent: Seven counties in New York, covering approximately 4,474 total square miles. East Zone AOI is Franklin and St. Lawrence Counties, Central Zone AOI is Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, and Oswego Counties. Dataset Description: New York FEMA 2016 QL2 Lidar project called for the planning, acquisition, processing, and derivative products of lidar data to be collected at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters. Project specifications are based on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Base Lidar Specification, Version 1.2. Lidar data was delivered as flightline-extent unclassified LAS swaths, as processed classified LAS 1.4 files formatted to 4,597 individual 1,500-meter x 1,500-meter tiles, as tiled intensity imagery, and as tiled bare earth DEMs; all tiled to the same 1,500-meter x 1,500-meter schema. Continuous breaklines were produced in Esri file geodatabase format. Contours with a 1-foot interval were produced in Esri file geodatabase format, tiled to the same 1,500-meter x 1,500-meter schema. Ground Conditions: Lidar was collected in winter/spring of 2016/2017, while no snow was on the ground and rivers were at or below normal levels. In order to post process the lidar data to meet task order specifications and meet ASPRS vertical accuracy guidelines, Quantum Spatial, Inc. established a total of 76 ground control points that were used to calibrate the lidar to known ground locations established throughout the New York East Zone (Franklin and St. Lawrence Counties) project area. An additional 71 independent accuracy checkpoints, 71 in Bare Earth and Urban landcovers (59 NVA points), 59 in Forested, Brushland/Trees, and Tall Weeds/Crops categories (59 VVA points), were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the data. Quantum Spatial, Inc. established a total of 30 ground control points that were used to calibrate the lidar to known ground locations established throughout the New York Central Zone (Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, and Oswego Counties) project area. An additional 68 independent accuracy checkpoints, 43 in Bare Earth and Urban landcovers (43 NVA points), 25 in Forested, Brushland/Trees, and Tall Weeds/Crops categories (25 VVA points), were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the data. These checkpoints were not used to calibrate or post process the data. The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) downloaded the 5948 DEM files (4597 files for the East Zone AOI and 1351 files for the Central Zone AOI) from the New York State GIS site. The data were downloaded from these URLs: ftp://ftp.gis.ny.gov/elevation/DEM/FEMA_FranklinStLawrence2016/ and ftp://ftp.gis.ny.gov/elevation/DEM/FEMA_OneidaSubbasin2016/. The data were processed to the Data Access Viewer (DAV) and http. In addition to these bare earth Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, the lidar point data that these DEM data were created from and the breaklines are also available. These data are available for custom download at the link provided in the URL section of this metadata record. |
* Purpose |
To acquire detailed surface elevation data for use in conservation planning, design, research, floodplain mapping, dam safety assessments and elevation modeling, etc. Classified LAS files are used to show the manually reviewed bare earth surface. This allows the user to create intensity images, breaklines, raster DEMs, and contours. The purpose of these lidar data was to produce high accuracy 3D hydro-flattened digital elevation models (DEMs) with a 1-meter cell size. These raw lidar point cloud data were used to create classified lidar LAS files, intensity images, 3D breaklines, hydro-flattened DEMs, and contours as necessary. |
Notes | |
Other Citation Details | |
• Supplemental Information |
Raster File Type = IMG Bit Depth/Pixel Type = 32-bit float Raster Cell Size = 1.0 Meter Interpolation or Resampling Technique = Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN), Linear Interpolation, Proprietary |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) | |
DOI Registration Authority | |
DOI Issue Date |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords | EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION |
ISO 19115 Topic Category | elevation |
None | DEM |
Temporal Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
* Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NEW YORK |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords | VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE |
Stratum Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords | LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging |
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords | Airplane > Airplane |
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords | DEM > Digital Elevation Model |
Physical Location
• » Organization | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
• » City | Charleston |
• » State/Province | SC |
• Country | |
• » Location Description |
Data Set Information
* Data Set Scope Code | Data Set |
---|---|
• Data Set Type | Elevation |
• Maintenance Frequency | None Planned |
Maintenance Note | |
» Data Presentation Form | Model (digital) |
• Entity Attribute Overview | |
Entity Attribute Detail Citation | |
Entity Attribute Detail URL | |
Distribution Liability |
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners. |
Data Set Credit | Quantum Spatial, Inc. |
Support Roles
* » Support Role | Data Steward |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2021 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Distributor |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2021 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Metadata Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2021 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | Point of Contact |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | 2021 |
Date Effective To | |
Organization | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone | (843) 740-1202 |
Fax | |
Mobile | |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Business Hours | |
Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
* » Support Role | |
---|---|
* » Date Effective From | |
Date Effective To | |
* » Contact | |
* Contact Instructions |
Extents
Currentness Reference | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Description |
---|
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
* » W° Bound | -76.384505 |
---|---|
* » E° Bound | -73.951082 |
* » N° Bound | 45.018775 |
* » S° Bound | 42.773896 |
* » Description |
Extent Group 1 / Vertical Extent
EPSG Code | |
---|---|
Vertical Minimum | |
Vertical Maximum |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2016-11-12 |
End | 2017-05-12 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
East Zone (Franklin and St. Lawrence Counties) |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 2
* » Time Frame Type | Range |
---|---|
* » Start | 2016-11-14 |
End | 2017-04-23 |
Alternate Start As Of Info | |
Alternate End As Of Info | |
Description |
Central Zone (Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego Counties) |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
Angular Distance | |
---|---|
Angular Distance Units | |
Horizontal Distance | |
Horizontal Distance Units | |
Vertical Distance | |
Vertical Distance Units | |
Equivalent Scale Denominator | |
Level of Detail Description |
Spatial Representation
Grid Representation Used? | |
---|---|
Vector Representation Used? | |
Text / Table Representation Used? | |
TIN Representation Used? | |
Stereo Model Representation Used? | |
Video Representation Used? |
Grid Representation
Dimension Count | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry | |||||||||||||
Transformation Parameter Available? | |||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Axis Dimension |
|||||||||||||
|
Vector Representation
Topology Level | |
---|---|
Complex Object Present? | |
Complex Object Count | |
Composite Object Present? | |
Composite Object Count | |
Curve Object Present? | |
Curve Object Count | |
Point Object Present? | |
Point Object Count | |
Solid Object Present? | |
Solid Object Count | |
Surface Object Present? | |
Surface Object Count |
Reference Systems
Reference System
EPSG Code | EPSG:5703 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System
EPSG Code | EPSG:6534 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System
EPSG Code | EPSG:6536 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System
EPSG Code | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horizontal Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical Resolution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Data License | |
---|---|
Data License URL | |
Data License Statement | |
* » Security Class | Unclassified |
* Security Classification System | |
Security Handling Description | |
• Data Access Policy | |
» Data Access Procedure |
Data is available online for bulk and custom downloads. |
• » Data Access Constraints |
None |
• Data Use Constraints |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Metadata Access Constraints | |
Metadata Use Constraints |
Distribution Information
Start Date | 2021-06-04 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=9315/details/9315 |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2021 - Present) |
File Name | Customized Download |
Description |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | Zip |
Distribution Format | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | Zip |
Review Status |
Start Date | 2021-06-04 |
---|---|
End Date | Present |
» Download URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/NY_Franklin_StLawr_DEM_2017_9315/index.html |
Distributor | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2021 - Present) |
File Name | Bulk Download |
Description |
Bulk download of data files in the original coordinate system. |
File Date/Time | |
File Type (Deprecated) | GeoTIFF |
Distribution Format | GeoTIFF |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Start Date | |
---|---|
End Date | |
» Download URL | |
Distributor | |
File Name | |
Description | |
File Date/Time | |
File Type | |
FGDC Content Type | |
File Size | |
Application Version | |
Compression | |
Review Status |
Archive Information
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
Location | |
---|---|
File Identifier | |
File Name | |
URL | |
Description | |
DOI | |
Archive Date | |
Archive Update Frequency |
URLs
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/ |
---|---|
Name | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) website |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | HTML |
Description |
Information on the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | HTML |
Description |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=9321/details/9321 |
---|---|
Name | Custom Point Download |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | Zip |
Description |
Link to custom download, from the Data Access Viewer (DAV), the lidar point data from which these raster Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data were created. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/ny2017_frank_stlwr_m9321.kmz |
---|---|
Name | Browse Graphic |
URL Type | Browse Graphic |
File Resource Format | KML |
Description |
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/NY_FEMA_R2_LiDAR_2016_D17_Survey_Report.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Survey Report |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the survey report. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/29614_NY_ProjectReport.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Project Report |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the project report. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/29614_NY_ProjectReportAppendices.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Project Report Appendices |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the project report appendices. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/29614_NY_FEMA_FOCUS_on_NYEast.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Quantum Spatial FOCUS Report - East Zone |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the Quantum Spatial FOCUS Report for the East Zone project area. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/29614_NY_FEMA_FOCUS_on_Accuracy_NYEast.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Quantum Spatial FOCUS on Accuracy Report - East Zone |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the Quantum Spatial FOCUS on Accuracy Report for the East Zone project area. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/29614_NY_FEMA_FOCUS.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Quantum Spatial FOCUS Report - Central Zone |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the Quantum Spatial FOCUS report for the Central Zone project area. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/supplemental/29614_NY_FEMA_FOCUS_on_Accuracy.pdf |
---|---|
Name | Quantum Spatial FOCUS on Accuracy Report - Central Zone |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Link to the Quantum Spatial FOCUS on Accuracy report for the Central Zone project area. |
URL | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/9321/breaklines/ |
---|---|
Name | Hydro Breaklines |
URL Type | Online Resource |
File Resource Format | Zip |
Description |
Link to the hydro breaklines. |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
URL | |
---|---|
Name | |
URL Type | |
File Resource Format | |
Description |
Activity Log
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Activity Time | |
---|---|
Activity Type | |
Responsible Party | |
Description |
Issues
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Issue Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Issue |
Technical Environment
Description |
|
---|
Data Quality
Representativeness | |
---|---|
Accuracy | |
Analytical Accuracy | |
Horizontal Positional Accuracy | |
Vertical Positional Accuracy |
East Zone (Franklin, St. Lawrence Counties) Project specifications require the accuracy (ACCz) of the derived DEM be calculated and reported in two ways: 1. Required NVA : 19.6 cm at a 95% confidence level, derived according to NSSDA, i.e., based on RMSE of 10 cm in bare earth and urban land cover classes. This is a required accuracy. NVA was tested with 71 checkpoints located in bare earth and urban (non-vegetated) areas; points BE03 and UA01 were excluded as they fell outside project AOI. 2. Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA): VVA reported for forested, brushland/trees, and tall weeds/crops land cover classes. Target VVA: 29.4 cm at the 95th percentile, derived according to ASPRS Guidelines, Vertical Accuracy Reporting for Lidar Data, i.e., based on 95th percentile error in all vegetated land cover classes combined. This is a target accuracy. VVA was tested with 58 of 59 checkpoints located in forested, brushland/trees, and tall weeds/crops (vegetated) areas; point F023 excluded as it fell outside AOI. Checkpoints were distributed throughout project area and were surveyed using GPS techniques. See survey report for additional survey methodologies. AccuracyZ tested to meet 19.6 cm or better Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy at 95% confidence level using RMSE(z) x 1.9600 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASRPS Guidelines. Tested 0.0827 meters NVA at a 95% confidence level (4.2 cm RMSE) using RMSE(z) x 1.9600 as defined by National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA). Tested 0.2549 meters VVA calculated using 58 checkpoints located in Forested, Brushland/Trees, and Tall Weeds/Crops land cover categories at 95th percentile, derived according to ASPRS Guidelines, Vertical Accuracy Reporting for Lidar Data. Tested against DEM. Central Zone (Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego Counties) The project specifications require accuracy (ACCz) of the derived DEM be calculated and reported in two ways: 1. Required NVA : 19.6 cm at 95% confidence level, derived according to NSSDA, i.e., based on RMSE of 10 cm in bare earth and urban land cover classes. This is a required accuracy. NVA was tested with 41 of 43 checkpoints located in bare earth and urban (non-vegetated) areas; points BE03 and UA01 excluded as they fell outside project AOI. 2. Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA): VVA reported for forested, brushland/trees, and tall weeds/crops land cover classes. The target VVA: 29.4 cm at 95th percentile, derived according to ASPRS Guidelines, Vertical Accuracy Reporting for Lidar Data, i.e., based on 95th percentile error in all vegetated land cover classes combined. This is a target accuracy. The VVA tested with 21 of 25 checkpoints located in forested, brushland/trees, and tall weeds/crops (vegetated) areas; points FO01, FO02, FO03, FO11 and FO16 excluded as they fell outside the AOI. The checkpoints were distributed throughout project area and were surveyed using GPS techniques. See survey report for additional survey methodologies. AccuracyZ tested to meet 19.6 cm or better Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy at 95% confidence level using RMSE(z) x 1.9600 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASRPS Guidelines. Tested 0.1030 meters NVA at 95% confidence level (5.3 cm RMSE) using RMSE(z) x 1.9600 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA). Tested 0.1182 meters VVA calculated using 23 checkpoints located in Forested, Brushland/Trees, and Tall Weeds/Crops land cover categories at 95th percentile, derived according to ASPRS Guidelines, Vertical Accuracy Reporting for Lidar Data. Tested against DEM. |
Quantitation Limits | |
Bias | |
Comparability | |
Completeness Measure | |
Precision | |
Analytical Precision | |
Field Precision | |
Sensitivity | |
Detection Limit | |
Completeness Report |
Datasets contain complete coverage of tiles. No points have been removed or excluded. A visual qualitative assessment was performed to ensure data completeness. There are no void areas or missing data. The raw point cloud is of good quality and data passes Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy specifications. |
Conceptual Consistency |
Data covers the entire area specified for this project. |
» Quality Control Procedures Employed |
Data Management
» Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified? | |
---|---|
» Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management | |
» Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive? | |
» Is Access to the Data Limited Based on an Approved Waiver? | |
» If Distributor (Data Hosting Service) is Needed, Please Indicate | |
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Dissemination | |
» If Delay is Longer than Latency of Automated Processing, Indicate Under What Authority Data Access is Delayed |
|
» Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location | |
» If World Data Center or Other, Specify | |
» If To Be Determined, Unable to Archive, or No Archiving Intended, Explain |
|
» Approximate Delay Between Data Collection and Archiving | |
» How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive? |
|
Lineage
» Lineage Statement |
Data were collected and processed by Quantum Spatial, Inc. for FEMA. The DEM data were downloaded from the New York State GIS ftp site by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) where the data were processed to make it available for custom download from the Data Access Viewer (DAV) and bulk download from https. |
---|
Sources
Citation Title | New York State GIS website |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Citation Title | Quantum Spatial, Inc. |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Scale Denominator | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Source Contribution |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Citation Title | |
---|---|
Contact Role Type | |
Contact Type | |
Contact Name | |
Publish Date | |
Extent Type | |
Extent Start Date/Time | |
Extent End Date/Time | |
Citation URL | |
Citation URL Name | |
Citation URL Description | |
Scale Denominator |
Process Steps
Process Step Number | 1 |
---|---|
» Description |
Dataset Description: New York FEMA 2016 QL2 Lidar project called for the planning, acquisition, processing, and derivative products of lidar data to be collected at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters. Project specifications are based on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Base Lidar Specification, Version 1.2. The data for counties in the East Zone AOI were developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD83 (2011), State Plane New York East Zone, meters and vertical datum of NAVD88 (GEOID12B), meters. The data for counties in the Central Zone AOI were developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD83 (2011), State Plane New York Central Zone, meters and vertical datum of NAVD88 (GEOID12B), meters. Lidar data was delivered as flightline-extent unclassified LAS swaths, as processed classified LAS 1.4 files formatted to 5948 (4597 files for the East Zone AOI and 1351 files for the Central Zone AOI) individual 1,500-meter x 1,500-meter tiles, as tiled intensity imagery, and as tiled bare earth DEMs; all tiled to the same 1,500-meter x 1,500-meter schema. Continuous breaklines were produced in Esri file geodatabase format. Contours with a 1-foot interval were produced in Esri file geodatabase format, tiled to the same 1,500-meter x 1,500-meter schema. Ground Conditions: Lidar was collected in winter/spring of 2016/2017, while no snow was on the ground and rivers were at or below normal levels. |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 2 |
---|---|
» Description |
Hydro-Flattened Raster DEM Processing: Class 2 (Ground) lidar points in conjunction with the hydro breaklines were used to create a 1 meter hydro-flattened raster DEM. Using automated scripting routines within ArcMap, an ERDAS Imagine .IMG file was created for each tile. Each surface is reviewed using Global Mapper to check for any surface anomalies or incorrect elevations found within the surface. |
Process Date/Time | 2017-01-01 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | 3 |
---|---|
» Description |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) downloaded 5948 (4597 files for the East Zone AOI and 1351 files for the Central Zone AOI) digital elevation model (DEM) files in img format from the NY State GIS ftp site (ftp://ftp.gis.ny.gov/elevation/DEM/FEMA_FranklinStLawrence2016/ and ftp://ftp.gis.ny.gov/elevation/DEM/FEMA_OneidaSubbasin2016/) . The bare earth raster files were at a 1 m grid spacing. The data were in NY State Plane East (Franklin and St. Lawrence) and NY State Plane Central (Oneida Subbasin) NAD83 (2011), meters coordinates and NAVD88 (Geoid 12B) elevations in meters. OCM assigned the appropriate EPSG codes (Horiz - 6534 (Oneida Subbasin) and 6536 (Franklin and St.Lawrence), Vert - 5703) and copied the raster files to https for Digital Coast storage and provisioning purposes. |
Process Date/Time | 2021-06-04 00:00:00 |
Process Contact | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Process Step Number | |
---|---|
» Description | |
Process Date/Time | |
Process Contact | |
Phone (Voice) | |
Email Address | |
Source |
Acquisition Information
Instruments
Instrument Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Identifier | |
---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |
Instrument / Gear | |
Instrument Type | |
Description |
Platforms
Platform Unavailable Reason |
---|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
Identifier | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Docucomp UUID | |||||||
Description | |||||||
Mounted Instruments |
|||||||
|
FAQs
Date | |
---|---|
Author | |
Question | |
Answer |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
Score | Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Data Set (DS) | Cross Reference |
2016 - 2017 FEMA Lidar: Frankin and St. Lawrence Counties and Oneida Sub-Basin, NY |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID | 64733 |
---|---|
Metadata Record Created By | Rebecca Mataosky |
Metadata Record Created | 2021-06-04 15:56+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By | Kirk Waters |
» Metadata Record Last Modified | 2024-01-10 19:16+0000 |
Metadata Record Published | 2024-01-10 |
Owner Org | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish? | N |
Metadata Workflow State | Published / External |
Metadata Last Review Date | 2022-03-16 |
Metadata Review Frequency | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date | 2023-03-16 |
Tags |
---|