Reef Resilience Scores - Field Descriptions
Entity (ENT) | Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:50522 | Updated: August 9, 2022 | Published / External
Item Identification
Title: | Reef Resilience Scores - Field Descriptions |
---|---|
Short Name: | Reef Resilience Field Descriptions |
Status: | Completed |
Abstract: |
Composite 11 Resilience Scores: File provide scores for individual resilience metrics for the primary analysis with all 11 metrics. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Composite 8 Resilience scores: File provide scores for the secondary analysis with the eight metrics available for Taema Bank. Raw scores from each of the individual metrics were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. Although it is not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. |
Entity Information
Entity Type: | Data View |
---|---|
Active Version?: | Yes |
Description: |
The field descriptions for the reef resilience dataset. |
Data Attributes
Attribute Summary
![]() |
![]() |
Name | Type | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
100
|
RANK | INTEGER | Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11. | |
100
|
COMP 11 | NUMERIC | Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR). | |
100
|
BLE | NUMERIC | Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
DZ | NUMERIC | Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
DIV | NUMERIC | Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
FP | NUMERIC | Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
HERB | NUMERIC | Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
REC | NUMERIC | Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
MA | NUMERIC | Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
DAM | NUMERIC | Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
POLL | NUMERIC | Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
SED | NUMERIC | Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
SST VAR | NUMERIC | Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. | |
100
|
% CORAL | NUMERIC | Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%. | |
100
|
COMP 8 | NUMERIC | Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR). | |
100
|
ZONE | TEXT | The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank) |
Attribute Details
RANK
Data Storage Type: | INTEGER |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Rank of the zones, based on the resilience score (field COMP 11 or COMP 8) . Values range from 1-11. |
COMP 11
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Composite 11 resilience score, based on the mean of the 11 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, FP, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, POLL, SED, and SST VAR). |
BLE
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Bleaching resistance. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DZ
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Disease prevalence. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DIV
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Coral diversity. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
FP
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Fishing pressure. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
HERB
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Herbivory (reef fish). Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
REC
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Coral recruitment. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
MA
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Macroalgae cover. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
DAM
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Physical damage. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
POLL
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Pollution. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
SED
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Sedimentation. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
SST VAR
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Sea surface temperature variability. Raw scores were scaled from 0.0 to 1.0, where 1 represents the healthiest condition in the study. |
% CORAL
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Percent coral cover. Although not a metric used to analyze resilience, percent coral cover is provided as it is frequently used to evaluate reef status and prioritize management. Values range from 2.4-37.5%. |
COMP 8
Data Storage Type: | NUMERIC |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
Composite 8 resilience score, based on the mean of the 8 resilience metrics (BLE, DZ, DIV, HERB, REC, MA, DAM, and SST VAR). |
ZONE
Data Storage Type: | TEXT |
---|---|
Required: | No |
Primary Key: | No |
Status: | Active |
Description: |
The study zones around Tutuila and Aunu'u in American Samoa used in the reef resilience analysis: 11 zones in COMPOSITE 8 (includes Taema Bank), 10 zones in COMPOSITE 11 (excludes Taema Bank) |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 50522 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:50522 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Annette M DesRochers |
Metadata Record Created: | 2017-12-01 13:25+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | SysAdmin InPortAdmin |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2022-08-09 17:11+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2018-01-05 |
Owner Org: | PIFSC |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2018-01-05 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2019-01-05 |