2016 USGS Lidar DEM: Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia, Post-Hurricane Hermine, 10-12 September 2016
Data Set (DS) | OCM Partners (OCMP)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:56742 | Updated: January 10, 2024 | Published / External
Summary
Short Citation
OCM Partners, 2024: 2016 USGS Lidar DEM: Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia, Post-Hurricane Hermine, 10-12 September 2016, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/56742.
Full Citation Examples
A digital elevation model (DEM) mosaic was produced for Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia, post-Hurricane Hermine, from remotely sensed, geographically referenced elevation measurements collected by Quantum Spatial using a Riegl VQ-880-G (532-nm wavelength circular scan and 1064-nm wavelength linear scan) lidar sensor.
Distribution Information
-
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base.
-
Bulk download of data files in the original coordinate system.
None
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations.
Controlled Theme Keywords
COASTAL ELEVATION, elevation, SEAFLOOR TOPOGRAPHY, TERRAIN ELEVATION
Child Items
No Child Items for this record.
Contact Information
Point of Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Metadata Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Extents
-75.40368708° W,
-75.08583525° E,
38.32613127° N,
37.84866877° S
2016-09-10 - 2016-09-12
Item Identification
Title: | 2016 USGS Lidar DEM: Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia, Post-Hurricane Hermine, 10-12 September 2016 |
---|---|
Short Name: | 2016 hermine dem m8774 |
Status: | Completed |
Publication Date: | 2017-03-24 |
Abstract: |
A digital elevation model (DEM) mosaic was produced for Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia, post-Hurricane Hermine, from remotely sensed, geographically referenced elevation measurements collected by Quantum Spatial using a Riegl VQ-880-G (532-nm wavelength circular scan and 1064-nm wavelength linear scan) lidar sensor. |
Purpose: |
The purpose of this project was to produce a highly detailed and accurate digital elevation map for Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia for use as a management tool and to make these data available to natural-resource managers and research scientists. To ensure that SPCMSC data management protocols were followed, this survey was assigned a USGS field activity number (FAN), 16CNT03. Additional survey and data details are available at http://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=16CNT03. USGS Contract: G16PC00016 Task Order Number: G16D01063 |
Supplemental Information: |
Processed data products are used by the U.S. Geological Survey CMGP's National Assessment of Coastal Change Hazards project to quantify the vulnerability of shorelines to coastal change hazards such as severe storms, sea-level rise, and shoreline erosion and retreat. |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > BATHYMETRY/SEAFLOOR TOPOGRAPHY > SEAFLOOR TOPOGRAPHY
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION
|
ISO 19115 Topic Category |
elevation
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
Global Change Master Science Directory | DOI/USGS/CMG > COASTAL AND MARINE GEOLOGY, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR |
Global Change Master Science Directory | OCEAN > COASTAL PROCESSES > BARRIER ISLANDS |
Global Change Master Science Directory | OCEAN > COASTAL PROCESSES > BEACHES |
Global Change Master Science Directory | OCEAN > COASTAL PROCESSES > SHORELINE DISPLACEMENT |
None | Cessna Caravan |
None | DEM |
None | extratropical cyclone |
None | shoreline |
Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
VERTICAL LOCATION > SEA FLOOR
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
Geographic Names Information System | Assateague Island |
Geographic Names Information System | Delmarva Peninsula |
Geographic Names Information System | Maryland |
Geographic Names Information System | United States |
Geographic Names Information System | Virginia |
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords |
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
|
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
Airplane > Airplane
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
DEM > Digital Elevation Model
|
Physical Location
Organization: | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
City: | Charleston |
State/Province: | SC |
Data Set Information
Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
---|---|
Data Set Type: | Elevation |
Maintenance Frequency: | None Planned |
Data Presentation Form: | raster digital data |
Distribution Liability: |
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the USGS, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system, or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The USGS shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners |
Data Set Credit: | Acknowledgment of the U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, as a data source would be appreciated in products developed from these data, and such acknowledgment as is standard for citation and legal practices for data source is expected. Sharing of new data layers developed directly from these data would also be appreciated by the U.S. Geological Survey staff. Users should be aware that comparisons with other datasets for the same area from other periods may be inaccurate because of inconsistencies resulting from changes in photointerpretation, mapping conventions, and digital processes over time. These data are not legal documents and are not to be used as such., U.S. Geological Survey |
Support Roles
Data Steward
Date Effective From: | 2019-06-25 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
Date Effective From: | 2019-06-25 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Metadata Contact
Date Effective From: | 2019-06-25 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Point of Contact
Date Effective From: | 2019-06-25 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Extents
Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
W° Bound: | -75.40368708 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -75.08583525 | |
N° Bound: | 38.32613127 | |
S° Bound: | 37.84866877 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2016-09-10 |
End: | 2016-09-12 |
Spatial Information
Spatial Representation
Grid Representation 1
Dimension Count: | 2 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell Geometry: | Point | ||||||||
Transformation Parameters Available?: | Yes | ||||||||
Axis Dimension 1 |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Axis Dimension 2 |
|||||||||
|
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System 2
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Security Class: | Unclassified |
---|---|
Data Access Procedure: |
Data is available online for custom downloads |
Data Access Constraints: |
None |
Data Use Constraints: |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
Start Date: | 2019-06-25 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8774 |
Distributor: | |
File Name: | Customized Download |
Description: |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, map projection, file format, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. |
Compression: | Zip |
Distribution 2
Start Date: | 2019-06-25 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/USGS_Hermine_Topobathy_DEM_2016_8774/index.html |
Distributor: | |
File Name: | Bulk Download |
Description: |
Bulk download of data files in the original coordinate system. |
URLs
URL 1
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/ |
---|---|
Name: | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) website |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
File Resource Format: | HTML |
Description: |
Information on the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
URL 2
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name: | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
File Resource Format: | HTML |
Description: |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
URL 3
URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8767/supplemental/post_hermine_extent_m8767.kmz |
---|---|
Name: | Browse graphic |
URL Type: |
Browse Graphic
|
File Resource Format: | KML |
Description: |
This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set. |
URL 4
URL: | http://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=16CNT03 |
---|---|
Name: | Source |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
Description: |
Original USGS source data and information |
Technical Environment
Description: |
Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise Service Pack 1; Esri ArcCatalog 10.2.2.3552 |
---|
Data Quality
Vertical Positional Accuracy: |
Quantum Spatial reports that the contract specifications required that only Nonvegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) were computed for raw lidar point cloud swath files. The vertical accuracy was tested with 13 independent surveys located in open terrain. These check points were not used in the calibration or post-processing of the lidar point cloud data. The survey check points were distributed throughout the project area. The independent check points were surveyed using the closed level loop technique. Elevations from the unclassified lidar surface were measured for the x,y location of each check point. Elevations interpolated from the lidar surface were then compared to the elevation values of the surveyed control. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was computed to be 0.042. AccuracyZ has been tested as 0.082 meters AccuracyZ at 95 percent Confidence Interval, meeting 19.6 cm NVA at 95 percent confidence level using (RMSEz * 1.9600) as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Guidelines.Qualitative value:0.072 meters AccuracyZ at the 95 percent Confidence Interval for Raw LAS NVA. 0.063 meters AccuracyZ at the 95 percent Confidence Interval for DEM NVA. 0.137 meters AccuracyZ at the 95th percentile for DEM VVA., Test that produced the value: Quantum Spatial reports that the 13 independent NVA check points were surveyed using the closed level loop technique. Elevations interpolated from the unclassified lidar surface were compared to the elevation values of the surveyed NVA check points. The RMSE was computed to be 0.037 meters resulting in an AccuracyZ at the 95% confidence level of 0.072 meters. The 13 NVA check points were also compared to the elevations of the derived bare earth DEMs. The RMSE was computed to be 0.032 meters resulting in an AccuracyZ of 0.063 meters at the 95% confidence level. NVA AccuracyZ has been tested and meets the required 19.6 meter NVA at 95% confidence level using (RMSEz * 1.9600) for both the raw lidar point cloud and derived DEMs, as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA) and herein reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines. The 13 VVA check points were also surveyed using the closed level loop technique. Elevations for these points were compared to the elevations of the derived bare earth DEMs. The RMSE was computed to be 0.078 meters resulting in an AccuracyZ of 0.137 meters at the 95th percentile. AccuracyZ has been tested on the derived bare earth DEMs and meets the required 29.4 meter VVA using the 95th percentile of the absolute value of all vertical errors in all combined vegetation classes as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); and herein reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines. |
---|---|
Completeness Report: |
Quantum Spatial reports that the LAS files used to create the DEM include all data points collected. No points have been removed or excluded. Shaded relief images have been visually inspected for data errors such as pits, border artifacts, and shifting. Lidar flight lines have been examined to ensure consistent elevation values across overlapping flight lines. The raw point cloud is of good quality and data passes Vertical Accuracy specifications. |
Conceptual Consistency: |
Quantum Spatial reports that data cover the entire area specified for this project, approximately 52,196.2 acres. "NoData" values correspond with lack of submerged and/or bare-earth data within the survey bounds. |
Lineage
Lineage Statement: |
Quantum Spatial acquired and processed topobathy lidar data to DEMs. USGS combined the individual DEM tiles into a single GeoTiff. NOAA updated the georeferencing information and created a cloud optimized GeoTiff. |
---|
Process Steps
Process Step 1
Description: |
Quantum Spatial reports the following steps for Lidar Pre-Processing: 1. Review flight lines and data to ensure complete coverage of the study area and positional accuracy of the laser points. 2. Resolve kinematic corrections for aircraft position data using kinematic aircraft GPS and static ground GPS data. 3. Develop a smoothed best estimate of trajectory (SBET) file that blends post-processed aircraft position with sensor head position and attitude recorded throughout the survey. 4. Calculate laser point position by associating SBET position to each laser point return time, scan angle, intensity, etc. Create raw laser point cloud data for the entire survey in *.las format. Convert data to orthometric elevations by applying a geoid correction. 5. Import raw laser points into manageable blocks to perform manual relative accuracy calibration and filter erroneous points. Apply the refraction correction necessary for bathymetric data. Classify ground/bathymetric points for individual flight lines. 6. Using ground classified points per each flight line, test the relative accuracy. Perform automated line-to-line calibrations for system attitude parameters (pitch, roll, heading), mirror flex (scale) and GPS/IMU drift. Calculate calibrations on ground classified points from paired flight lines and apply results to all points in a flight line. Use every flight line for relative accuracy calibration. 7. Adjust the point cloud by comparing ground classified points to supplemental ground control points. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-11-30 00:00:00 |
Process Step 2
Description: |
Quantum Spatial reports the following steps for Lidar Post-Processing: 1. Classify data to ground and other client designated classifications using proprietary classification algorithms. 2. Manually QC data classification 3. After completion of classification and final QC approval, calculate density information and verify final accuracy calculations for the project using ground control quality check points. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-11-30 00:00:00 |
Process Step 3
Description: |
Quantum Spatial reports the following steps for Breaklines: Water boundary polygons were developed using manual editing techniques. Elevations were assigned to the waters edge from the LiDAR point cloud data. Breaklines were also used to classify water surface (class 41). |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-11-30 00:00:00 |
Process Step 4
Description: |
Quantum Spatial reports the following steps for Bathymetric Coverage: Bathymetric coverage was determined by triangulating bathymetric points (class 40) with and edge length maximum of 4.56m to identify all areas >9m2 lacking bathymetric data. This shapefile was used to control the extent of the topobathymetric DEMs. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-11-30 00:00:00 |
Process Step 5
Description: |
The provided DEM .IMG files were mosaicked using Global Mapper 16 (20160309) and exported as a GeoTIFF. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2016-12-28 00:00:00 |
Process Step 6
Description: |
The merged GeoTiff file was received from USGS by NOAA OCM. The georeferencing codes were changed to reflect NAD83(2011) and NAVD88 instead of generic NAD83. Coordinates were not changed. The GeoTiff was processed to a cloud optimized GeoTiff (COG) using GDAL version 2.4.1. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2019-06-25 00:00:00 |
Process Contact: | Waters, Kirk |
Email Address: | kirk.waters@noaa.gov |
Related Items
Item Type | Relationship Type | Title |
---|---|---|
Data Set (DS) | Cross Reference |
2016 USGS Lidar: Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia, Post-Hurricane Hermine, 10-12 September 2016 Point cloud used to derive this DEM |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 56742 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:56742 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Kirk Waters |
Metadata Record Created: | 2019-06-25 07:30+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | Kirk Waters |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2024-01-10 19:05+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2024-01-10 |
Owner Org: | OCMP |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2022-03-16 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 1 Year |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2023-03-16 |