2019 - 2020 NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar DEM: Hurricane Michael (NW Florida)
Data Set (DS) | National Geodetic Survey (NGS)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:69338 | Updated: January 10, 2024 | Published / External
Item Identification
Title: | 2019 - 2020 NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar DEM: Hurricane Michael (NW Florida) |
---|---|
Status: | Completed |
Publication Date: | 2023-01 |
Abstract: |
The 2019 - 2020 NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar DEM: Hurricane Michael data were collected by multiple contractors including NV5 and Dewberry. The 100 meter buffered project area consists of approximately 2,120,060 acres encompassing the Florida Panhandle and extending south to New Port Richey, Florida, and was collected between November 2019 - July 2020 using a Leica Chiroptera 4X system. The dataset includes topobathymetric digital elevation model data in geoTIFF format at 1 meter horizontal resolution. |
Purpose: |
This lidar data are an ancillary product of NOAA's Coastal Mapping Program (CMP), created through a wider Integrated Ocean and Coastal Mapping (IOCM) initiative to increase support for multiple uses of the data. It is not intended for mapping, charting, or navigation. In addition, it will be used for ongoing research efforts for testing and developing standards for airborne lidar. |
Supplemental Information: |
An automated ground classification algorithm was used to determine bare earth point classification. It should be noted that not all returns were correctly classified; therefore the user should examine for acceptability. |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION
|
ISO 19115 Topic Category |
elevation
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
CoRIS Theme Thesaurus | EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Bathymetry/Seafloor Topography > Bathymetry |
NOAA NOS Harvest Catalog | CoRIS |
Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE
|
UNCONTROLLED | |
CoRIS Place Thesaurus | COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > Florida |
CoRIS Place Thesaurus | OCEAN BASIN > Atlantic Ocean > North Atlantic Ocean > Florida |
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords |
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
|
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
Airplane > Airplane
|
Physical Location
Organization: | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
City: | Charleston |
State/Province: | SC |
Data Set Information
Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
---|---|
Data Set Type: | Elevation |
Maintenance Frequency: | None Planned |
Data Presentation Form: | Model (digital) |
Distribution Liability: |
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the National Geodetic Survey, the Office for Coastal Management, or its partners. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners |
Data Set Credit: | We request that you credit the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) when you use these data in a report, publication, or presentation., Department of Commerce (DOC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Geodetic Survey (NGS), Remote Sensing Division Department of Commerce (DOC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
Support Roles
Data Steward
Date Effective From: | 2023 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NGS Communications and Outreach Branch |
Email Address: | ngs.infocenter@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (301) 713-3242 |
Fax: | (301) 713-4172 |
Distributor
Date Effective From: | 2023 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Metadata Contact
Date Effective From: | 2023 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NGS Communications and Outreach Branch |
Email Address: | ngs.infocenter@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (301) 713-3242 |
Fax: | (301) 713-4172 |
Point of Contact
Date Effective From: | 2023 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NGS Communications and Outreach Branch |
Email Address: | ngs.infocenter@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (301) 713-3242 |
Fax: | (301) 713-4172 |
Extents
Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Description: |
Below are both the individual block extents as well as the overall dataset's extent. |
---|
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
W° Bound: | -85.668247 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -85.270902 | |
N° Bound: | 30.177297 | |
S° Bound: | 29.909435 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 1 extent covers 95,557 acres of the full project boundary. This Delivery 1 dataset is comprised of 2,286 - 500 m x 500 m LAS tiles. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 2
W° Bound: | -85.451502 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -83.989269 | |
N° Bound: | 30.177686 | |
S° Bound: | 29.544044 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 3 UTM 16 extent covers 341,153 acres of the full project boundary. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 3
W° Bound: | -84.010594 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -83.337362 | |
N° Bound: | 30.161341 | |
S° Bound: | 29.526019 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 3 UTM 17 extent covers 341,153 acres of the full project boundary. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 4
W° Bound: | -86.27383 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -85.490947 | |
N° Bound: | 30.38344 | |
S° Bound: | 30.047483 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 41 (Block 04) extent covers 192,811 acres of the full project boundary. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 5
W° Bound: | -88.05557 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -82.55326 | |
N° Bound: | 30.662192 | |
S° Bound: | 28.186447 |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 6
W° Bound: | -84.830004 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -84.301645 | |
N° Bound: | 30.123719 | |
S° Bound: | 29.663345 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 2 extent covers 166,578 acres of the full project boundary. This Delivery 2 dataset is comprised of 3,549 - 500 m x 500 m LAS tiles. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 7
W° Bound: | -87.313157 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -86.029265 | |
N° Bound: | 30.665212 | |
S° Bound: | 30.291658 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 42 (Block 05) extent covers 95,557 acres of the full project boundary. This Block 05 dataset is comprised of 9,006 - 500 m x 500 m LAS tiles. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 8
W° Bound: | -88.062939 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -87.311719 | |
N° Bound: | 30.506921 | |
S° Bound: | 30.209728 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 43 (Block 06) extent covers 153,351 acres of the full project boundary. This Block 06 dataset is comprised of 3,539 - 500 m x 500 m LAS tiles. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 9
W° Bound: | -83.435325 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -82.558583 | |
N° Bound: | 29.550452 | |
S° Bound: | 28.861074 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 44AA (Block 07)extent covers 276,009 acres of the full project boundary. This Block 07 dataset is comprised of 5,706 - 500 m x 500 m LAS tiles. |
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 10
W° Bound: | -82.841248 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -82.543431 | |
N° Bound: | 28.918952 | |
S° Bound: | 28.184556 | |
Description |
The NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar Delivery 44B (Block 08) extent covers 327,801 acres of the full project boundary. This Delivery 44B dataset is comprised of 5,826 - 500 m x 500 m LAS tiles. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2019-11-26 |
End: | 2020-04-28 |
Description: |
Delivery 44B (Block 08) acquisition dates spanned from 20191126-20200428 in 24 missions. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 2
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2019-11-27 |
End: | 2020-04-09 |
Description: |
Delivery 41 (Blcok 04) acquisition dates spanned from 20201127-20200409 in twenty-one missions. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 3
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2019-11-27 |
End: | 2020-02-22 |
Description: |
Block 1 collection dates. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 4
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2019-11-27 |
End: | 2020-07-30 |
Description: |
Delivery 3 UTM 16 acquisition dates spanned from 20201127-20200730 in forty-seven missions. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 5
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2019-12-04 |
End: | 2020-05-02 |
Description: |
Delivery 43 (Block 06) acquisition dates spanned from 20191204-20200502 in twenty one missions. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 6
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2019-12-15 |
End: | 2020-06-27 |
Description: |
Delivery 42 (Block 05) acquisition dates spanned from 20191215-20200627 in thirty-three missions. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 7
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2020-01-01 |
End: | 2020-07-30 |
Description: |
Delivery 2 acquisition dates spanned from 20200101-20200730 in twenty one missions. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 8
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2020-01-27 |
End: | 2020-04-28 |
Description: |
Delivery 44AA (Block 07) acquisition dates spanned from 20200127-20200428 in twenty-two missions. |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 9
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2020-02-15 |
End: | 2020-05-19 |
Description: |
Delivery 3 UTM 17 acquisition dates spanned from 20200215-20200519 in fifteen missions. |
Spatial Information
Spatial Resolution
Horizontal Distance: | 1.0 Meter |
---|
Spatial Representation
Representations Used
Grid: | Yes |
---|---|
Vector: | No |
Text / Table: | No |
TIN: | Yes |
Stereo Model: | No |
Video: | No |
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System 2
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference System 3
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Security Class: | Unclassified |
---|---|
Data Access Procedure: |
Data is available online for bulk or custom downloads |
Data Access Constraints: |
None |
Data Use Constraints: |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
Start Date: | 2023-01-26 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=9708/details/9708 |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2023 - Present) |
File Name: | Customized Download |
Description: |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. A new metadata will be produced to reflect your request using this record as a base. |
File Type (Deprecated): | Zip |
Compression: | Zip |
Distribution 2
Start Date: | 2023-01-26 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/NGS_NW_Florida_Topobathy_DEM_2020_9708/ |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2023 - Present) |
File Name: | Bulk Download |
Description: |
Simple download of data files. |
File Type (Deprecated): | GeoTIFF |
Distribution Format: | GeoTIFF |
URLs
URL 1
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ |
---|---|
Name: | NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) |
URL Type: |
Online Resource
|
File Resource Format: | HTML |
Description: |
The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. |
Technical Environment
Description: |
OS Independent |
---|
Data Quality
Horizontal Positional Accuracy: |
Lidar horizontal accuracy is a function of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) derived positional error, flying altitude, and INS derived attitude error. The obtained RMSEr value is multiplied by a conversion factor of 1.7308 to yield the horizontal component of the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA) reporting standard where a theoretical point will fall within the obtained radius 95 percent of the time (ACCr). Based on a flying altitude of 400 meters, an IMU error of 0.004 decimal degrees, and a GNSS positional error of 0.008 meters, the RMSEr value for the Delivery 1 area is 0.05 meters, with a ACCr of 0.09 meters at the 95% confidence level. The project specification requires horizontal positions to be accurate to 1.0m(RMSE). Based on a flying altitude of 400 meters, an IMU error of 0.007 decimal degrees, and a GNSS positional error of 0.027 meters, the RMSEr value for the Delivery 2 area is 0.09 meters, with a ACCr of 0.16 meters at the 95% confidence level. Horizontal Accuracy was not reported in the contractor provided metadata for the remaining blocks. |
---|---|
Vertical Positional Accuracy: |
Block 1 UTM 16: Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy tested 0.061 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 5 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.031 m) x 1.9600. Vegetated Vertical Accuracy tested 0.209 m at the 95th% against the bare earth DEM using 8 landclass points. The dataset tested 0.053 m vertical accuracy at 95% confidence level against the derived topobathymetric bare earth DEM using 10 submerged check points, based on RMSEz (0.027 m) x 1.9600. Block 2 UTM 16: NVA tested 0.046 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 9 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.024 m) x 1.9600. VVA tested 0.090 m at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 4 landclass points. The dataset tested 0.247 m at 95% confidence against the derived topbathy bare earth DEM using 82 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.126 m) x 1.9600. Block 3 UTM 16: NVA tested 0.096 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 29 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.049 m) x 1.9600.VVA tested 0.146 m at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 18 landclass points. The dataset tested 0.258 m at 95% confidence against the derived topobathy bare earth DEM using 78 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.134 m) x 1.9600. BLock 3 UTM 17: NVA tested 0.096 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 29 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.049 m) x 1.9600. VVA tested 0.146 m vertical accuracy at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 18 landclass points. The dataset tested 0.258 m at 95% confidence against the derived topobathy bare earth DEM using 78 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.134 m) x 1.9600. Block 4 UTM 16: NVA tested 0.107 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 12 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.055 m) x 1.9600. VVA tested 0.218 m at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 7 landclass points. The dataset tested 0.231 m at 95% confidence against the derived topobathy bare earth DEM using 29 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.118 m) x 1.9600. Block 5 UTM 16: NVA tested 0.106 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 23 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.054 m) x 1.9600. VVA tested 0.367 m at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 13 landclass points The dataset tested 0.230 m at 95% confidence against the derived topobathy bare earth DEM using 78 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.117 m) x 1.9600. Block 6 UTM 16: NVA tested 0.098 m vertical accuracy at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 6 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.050 m) x 1.9600. VVA tested 0.088 m at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 6 landclass points. The dataset tested 0.294 m at 95% confidence against the derived topobathy bare earth DEM using 55 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.150 m) x 1.9600. Block 7 UTM 17: NVA tested 0.067 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 10 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.034 m) x 1.9600. VVA tested 0.146 m vertical accuracy at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 13 landclass points. The dataset tested 0.117 m vertical accuracy at 95% confidence against the derived topobathymetric bare earth DEM using 26 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.060 m) x 1.9600. Block 8 UTM 17: NVA tested 0.060 m at 95% confidence level against the derived bare earth DEM in open terrain using 8 ground check points, based on RMSEz (0.031 m) x 1.9600. VVA tested 0.188 m at the 95th % against the derived bare earth DEM using 6 land class points. The dataset tested 0.139 m at 95% confidence against the derived topobathy bare earth DEM using 83 submerged checkpoints, RMSEz (0.071 m) x 1.9600. |
Completeness Report: |
Data covers the 599 tiles (5000m x 5000m tiles). |
Conceptual Consistency: |
Not applicable |
Data Management
Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified?: | Yes |
---|---|
Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management: | Unknown |
Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive?: | Yes |
Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location: | NCEI-CO |
How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive?: |
Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage. |
Lineage
Sources
Processed Lidar
Contact Role Type: | Originator |
---|---|
Contact Type: | Organization |
Contact Name: | NV5 |
Process Steps
Process Step 1
Description: |
Data for the NOAA Michael Topobathymetric Lidar project area was acquired by Quantum Spatial (QSI) using a Leica Chiroptera 4X Topobathy lidar system. All derived LAS data was referenced to: Horizontal Datum-NAD83(2011) epoch: 2010.00 Projection-UTM Zone 16N and UTM17N Horizontal Units-meters Vertical Datum-GRS80 Ellipsoid Vertical Units-meters The collected Lidar data were immediately processed in the field by QSI to a level that will allow QA\QC measures to determine if the sensor is functioning properly and assess the coverage of submerged topography. An initial SBET was created in POSPAC MMS 8.3 SP3 and loaded into RiProcess which applies pre-calibrated angular misalignment corrections of scanner position to extract the raw point cloud into geo-referenced LAS files. These files were inspected for sensor malfunctions and then passed through automated raster generation using LAStools to develop an initial assessment of bathymetric coverage. QSI reviewed all acquired flight lines to ensure complete coverage and positional accuracy of the laser points. These rasters were also used to create an initial product in Quick Look Coverage Maps. These Quick Look files are not fully processed data or final products but provide rapid assessment of approximate coverage and depth penetration. QSI resolved kinematic corrections for aircraft position data using aircraft GNSS and Applanix's proprietary PP-RTX solution. When PP-RTX was not used QSI conducted static Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) ground surveys (1 Hz recording frequency) using base stations over known monument locations during flights. After the airborne survey, static GPS data were triangulated with nearby Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) using the Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) for precise positioning. Multiple independent sessions over the same base station were performed to confirm antenna height measurements and to refine position accuracy. This data was used to correct the continuous on board measurements of the aircraft position recorded throughout the flight. A final smoothed best estimate trajectory (SBET) was developed that blends post-processed aircraft position with attitude data. Using the SBETs, sensor head position and attitude were then calculated throughout the survey. Trimble Business Center v.3.90, Blue Marble Geographic Calculator 2019, and PosPac MMS 8.3 SP3 were used for these processes. Following final SBET creation, QSI used Leica Lidar Survey Studio (LSS) to calculate laser point positioning by associating SBET positions to each laser point return time, scan angle, and intensity. Leica LSS was used to derive a synthetic water surface to create a water surface model. All LiDAR data below water surface models were classified as water column to correct for refraction. Light travels at different speeds in air versus water and its direction of travel or angle is changed or refracted when entering the water column. The refraction tool corrects for this difference by adjusting the depth (distance traveled) and horizontal positioning (change of angle/direction) of the LiDAR data. Using raster-based QC methods, the output data is verified to ensure the refraction tool functioned properly. Dewberry performed the calibration of the NOAA Michael Delivery 1 Lidar dataset in addition to the point cloud classification in order to create the final topobathymetric lidar deliverables which were subsequently reviewed by QSI. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2020-06-26 00:00:00 |
Source: | Processed Lidar |
Process Step 2
Description: |
Relative accuracy of the green swaths compared to overlapping and adjacent green swaths as well as the relative accuracy of green swaths compared to overlapping and adjacent NIR swaths was verified through the use of Delta-Z (DZ) orthos. Dewberry created DZ rasters using proprietary processing tools. The intraswath or within a swath accuracy were verified using GIS software. Profiles of elevated planar features, such as roofs, were used to verify horizontal alignment between overlapping swaths. All lidar data was peer-reviewed. QAQC also included creating void polygons for use during review. All necessary edits were applied to the dataset. NV5 Geospatial's proprietary software, LAS Monkey, was used to update LAS header information, including all projection and coordinate reference system information. The final lidar data is in LAS format 1.4 and point data record format 6. The contractor delivered classification scheme is as follows: 1- Unclassified 2- Ground 7- Noise 40- Bathymetric bottom or submerged topography 41- Water surface 43- Submerged object 45- water column 46- overlap bathy bottom - temporally different from a separate lift 71- unclassified associated with areas of overlap bathy bottom/temporal bathymetric differences 72- ground associated with areas of overlap bathy bottom/temporal bathymetric differences 81- water surface associated with areas of overlap bathy bottom/temporal bathymetric differences 85- water column associated with areas of overlap bathy bottom/temporal bathymetric differences 1Overlap- Edge clip 1Withheld- Green laser returns in topo only areas 42Synthetic- derived water surface All data was then verified by an Independent QC department. The independent QC was performed by separate analysts who did not perform manual classification or editing. The independent QC involved quantitative and qualitative reviews. |
---|---|
Source: | Processed Lidar |
Process Step 3
Description: |
Dewberry transformed the final LiDAR data from ellipsoid heights to orthometric heights referenced to NAVD88, Geoid12b to create the final topobathymetric void clipped DEMs. The topobathymetric bare earth DEMs were output at 1 meter resolution in GeoTIFF format into 5000 m x 5000 m tiles. The rasters are clipped to the extent of the project boundary and named according to project specifications. A bathymetric void shapefile was created to indicate areas where there was a lack of bathymetric returns. This shape was created by triangulating bathymetric bottom points with an edge length maximum of 4.56m to identify all areas greater then 9 square meters without bathymetric returns. This shapefile was used to clip and exclude interpolated elevation data from these areas in the bathymetric void clipped topobathymetric bare earth model. |
---|---|
Source: | Processed Lidar |
Process Step 4
Description: |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) received tiff files in UTM Zone 17N and 16N NAD83(2011), meters coordinates. Vertical positions were provided in NAVD88 (Geoid18) elevations and in meters. OCM performed the following processing for data storage and Digital Coast provisioning purposes: 1. The data were converted to Cloud Optimized GeoTiff (COG) format and the projection and vertical datum EPSG codes were assigned. 2. The data were copied to https |
---|---|
Process Contact: | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 69338 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:69338 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Blake Waring |
Metadata Record Created: | 2023-02-22 15:23+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | Kirk Waters |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2024-01-10 19:28+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2024-01-10 |
Owner Org: | NGS |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2023-01-30 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 2 Years |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2025-01-30 |