2022 NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar: Big Bend WMA, FL
Data Set (DS) | National Geodetic Survey (NGS)GUID: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:73046 | Updated: July 10, 2024 | Published / External
Summary
Short Citation
National Geodetic Survey, 2024: 2022 NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar: Big Bend WMA, FL, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/73046.
Full Citation Examples
These data were collected by Dewberry using a CZMIL Super Nova system. The data were acquired from 20221027 through 20221129. The data include topobathy data in LAS 1.4 format classified as unclassified (1); ground (2); low noise (7); high noise (18); bathymetric bottom (40); water surface (41); derived water surface (42); and submerged object, not otherwise specified (e.g., wreck, rock, submerged piling) (43) in accordance with project specifications. The project consists of approximately 1,373 square miles of data along the shores of Big Bend and contains 17,482 500 m x 500 m lidar tiles. This North Block dataset contains 8,054 500 m x 500 m tiles.
Distribution Information
-
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc.
-
LAS/LAZ - LASer
Simple download of data files.
None
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations.
Controlled Theme Keywords
COASTAL BATHYMETRY, COASTAL ELEVATION, elevation, TOPOGRAPHICAL RELIEF MAPS
Child Items
Type | Title |
---|---|
Entity | NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar Class Scheme: Big Bend WMA, FL |
Contact Information
Metadata Contact
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM)
coastal.info@noaa.gov
(843) 740-1202
https://coast.noaa.gov
Extents
-84.340385° W,
-83.340036° E,
30.092101° N,
29.357615° S
2022-10-27 - 2022-11-29
Item Identification
Title: | 2022 NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar: Big Bend WMA, FL |
---|---|
Status: | Completed |
Creation Date: | 2023 |
Abstract: |
These data were collected by Dewberry using a CZMIL Super Nova system. The data were acquired from 20221027 through 20221129. The data include topobathy data in LAS 1.4 format classified as unclassified (1); ground (2); low noise (7); high noise (18); bathymetric bottom (40); water surface (41); derived water surface (42); and submerged object, not otherwise specified (e.g., wreck, rock, submerged piling) (43) in accordance with project specifications. The project consists of approximately 1,373 square miles of data along the shores of Big Bend and contains 17,482 500 m x 500 m lidar tiles. This North Block dataset contains 8,054 500 m x 500 m tiles. |
Purpose: |
The National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Remote Sensing Division (RSD) Coastal Mapping Program (CMP) requires the collection of airborne topographic/bathymetric Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) and digital camera imagery data to enable accurate and consistent measurement of the national shoreline. |
Supplemental Information: |
Data include all lidar returns. Outliers or false returns (e.g., returns from birds, atmospheric particles, and/or system noise) may be present in the data. An automated ground classification algorithm was used to determine bare earth point classification. It should be noted that not all returns were correctly classified; therefore the user should examine for acceptability. |
Keywords
Theme Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION > TOPOGRAPHICAL RELIEF MAPS
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > BATHYMETRY/SEAFLOOR TOPOGRAPHY > BATHYMETRY > COASTAL BATHYMETRY
|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords |
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION
|
ISO 19115 Topic Category |
elevation
|
Spatial Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > FLORIDA
|
Instrument Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords |
LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging
|
Platform Keywords
Thesaurus | Keyword |
---|---|
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
Airplane > Airplane
|
Physical Location
Organization: | Office for Coastal Management |
---|---|
City: | Charleston |
State/Province: | SC |
Data Set Information
Data Set Scope Code: | Data Set |
---|---|
Data Set Type: | Elevation |
Maintenance Frequency: | None Planned |
Data Presentation Form: | Model (digital) |
Distribution Liability: |
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, the National Geodetic Survey, the Office for Coastal Management, or its partners. |
Data Set Credit: | We request that you credit the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) when you use these data in a report, publication, or presentation. |
Support Roles
Data Steward
Date Effective From: | 2024 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Distributor
Date Effective From: | 2024 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Metadata Contact
Date Effective From: | 2024 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) |
Address: |
2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston, SC 29405-2413 |
Email Address: | coastal.info@noaa.gov |
Phone: | (843) 740-1202 |
URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov |
Originator
Date Effective From: | 2024 |
---|---|
Date Effective To: | |
Contact (Organization): | National Geodetic Survey (NGS) |
Address: |
1315 East-West Hwy Silver Spring, MD 20910 |
URL: | https://geodesy.noaa.gov/ |
Extents
Currentness Reference: | Ground Condition |
---|
Extent Group 1
Extent Group 1 / Geographic Area 1
W° Bound: | -84.340385 | |
---|---|---|
E° Bound: | -83.340036 | |
N° Bound: | 30.092101 | |
S° Bound: | 29.357615 |
Extent Group 1 / Time Frame 1
Time Frame Type: | Range |
---|---|
Start: | 2022-10-27 |
End: | 2022-11-29 |
Spatial Information
Spatial Representation
Representations Used
Vector: | Yes |
---|
Reference Systems
Reference System 1
Coordinate Reference System |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access Information
Security Class: | Unclassified |
---|---|
Data Access Procedure: |
Data is available online for bulk and custom downloads. |
Data Access Constraints: |
None |
Data Use Constraints: |
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. |
Distribution Information
Distribution 1
Start Date: | 2023 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=10149 |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2024 - Present) |
File Name: | Customized Download |
Description: |
Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. |
File Type (Deprecated): | ZIP |
Compression: | Zip |
Distribution 2
Start Date: | 2023 |
---|---|
End Date: | Present |
Download URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/10149/index.html |
Distributor: | NOAA Office for Coastal Management (NOAA/OCM) (2024 - Present) |
File Name: | Bulk Download |
Description: |
Simple download of data files. |
File Type (Deprecated): | LAZ |
Distribution Format: | LAS/LAZ - LASer |
Compression: | LAZ |
URLs
URL 1
URL: | https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid18/10149/supplemental/extent_ngs_big_bend_2022_m10149.kmz |
---|---|
Name: | Browse Graphic |
URL Type: |
Browse Graphic
|
File Resource Format: | kmz |
Description: |
This graphic shows the lidar footprint for this dataset. |
Technical Environment
Description: |
OS Independent |
---|
Data Quality
Accuracy: |
Lidar vendors calibrate their lidar systems during installation of the system and then again for every project acquired. Typical calibrations include cross flights that capture features from multiple directions that allow adjustments to be performed so that the captured features are consistent between all swaths and cross flights from all directions. |
---|---|
Horizontal Positional Accuracy: |
Only checkpoints photo-identifiable in the intensity imagery can be used to test the horizontal accuracy of the lidar. Photo-identifiable checkpoints in intensity imagery typically include checkpoints located at the ends of paint stripes on concrete or asphalt surfaces or checkpoints located at 90 degree corners of different reflectivity, e.g. a sidewalk corner adjoining a grass surface. The xy coordinates of checkpoints, as defined in the intensity imagery, are compared to surveyed xy coordinates for each photo-identifiable checkpoint. These differences are used to compute the tested horizontal accuracy of the lidar. As not all projects contain photo-identifiable checkpoints, the horizontal accuracy of the lidar cannot always be tested. This data set was produced to meet ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data (2014) for a 41 cm RMSEx/RMSEy Horizontal Accuracy Class which equates to Positional Horizontal Accuracy = +/- 1 meter at a 95% confidence level. |
Vertical Positional Accuracy: |
The vertical accuracy of the classified lidar will be tested by Dewberry with 61 independent survey checkpoints. The survey checkpoints are evenly distributed throughout the project area and are located in areas of non-vegetated terrain, including bare earth, open terrain, and urban terrain (40); and submerged bottom areas (21). The interim North Block delivery contained 16 Non-vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) points and 7 Bathymetric Vertical Accuracy(BVA) points. The vertical accuracy is tested by comparing survey checkpoints to a triangulated irregular network (TIN) that is created from the lidar ground and submerged bottom points. Checkpoints are always compared to interpolated surfaces created from the lidar point cloud because it is unlikely that a survey checkpoint will be located at the precise location of a discrete lidar point. All checkpoints located in non-vegetated terrain were used to compute the NVA. Project specifications require a NVA of 19.6 cm at the 95% confidence level based on RMSEz (10 cm) x 1.9600. All checkpoints located in bathymetric areas were used to compute an accuracy value for the BVA. Project specifications require the vertical accuracy for bathymetric data to be 58.8 cm or better at the 95% confidence level based on depth-dependent RMSEz (30.0 cm) x 1.9600. This interim lidar dataset was tested to meet ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data (2014) for a 10 cm RMSEz Vertical Accuracy Class. Actual NVA accuracy was found to be RMSEz = 4.0 cm, equating to +/- 7.7 cm at the 95% confidence level. This interim lidar dataset was tested to meet ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data (2014) for a 30.0 cm RMSEz Vertical Accuracy Class. Actual Bathymetric accuracy was found to be RMSEz = 22.5 cm, equating to +/- 44.2 cm at the 95% confidence level. |
Conceptual Consistency: |
Not applicable |
Data Management
Have Resources for Management of these Data Been Identified?: | Yes |
---|---|
Approximate Percentage of Budget for these Data Devoted to Data Management: | Unknown |
Do these Data Comply with the Data Access Directive?: | Yes |
Actual or Planned Long-Term Data Archive Location: | NCEI-CO |
How Will the Data Be Protected from Accidental or Malicious Modification or Deletion Prior to Receipt by the Archive?: |
Data is backed up to tape and to cloud storage. |
Lineage
Sources
Acquisition and Processing
Contact Role Type: | Originator |
---|---|
Contact Type: | Organization |
Contact Name: | Dewberry |
Process Steps
Process Step 1
Description: |
Data were processed to an initial LAS format using Teledyne CARIS software. CARIS was also utilized for GPS and inertial processing, and Terrasolid and LAStools were used for data visualization, 3D editing, and export to final LAS/LAZ. Data were processed using NAD83(2011) horizontal and vertical datums. The data are in UTM Zone 17 coordinates and ellipsoid elevations in meters. The data classifications are: unclassified (1); ground (2); noise (7); water surface (topographic sensor) (18); bathymetric bottom (40); water surface (41); derived water surface (42); and submerged object, not otherwise specified (e.g., wreck, rock, submerged piling) (43) in accordance with project specifications. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2023-01-10 00:00:00 |
Process Contact: | National Geodetic Survey (NGS) |
Process Step 2
Description: |
The boresight for each lift was done individually as the solution may change slightly from lift to lift. The initial points for each mission calibration were inspected for flight line errors, flight line overlap, slivers or gaps in the data, point data minimums, or issues with the lidar unit or GPS. Roll, pitch and scanner scale were optimized during the calibration process until the relative accuracy was met.
Dewberry utilized Bayesmap StripAlign for this alignment procedure. This alignment procedure corrected systematic issues globally, per aircraft lift, per flightline, and finally based on local errors along the flight trajectory. Error adjustments included internal sensor parameters. Due to the complex geometric relationship of the elliptical scan pattern the forward and reverse directions must be aligned independently. Additionally, since the green and NIR scanner map different surfaces, they were also aligned independently, then corrected to match each other. Difference rasters (DZ orthos) were generated, adjustment parameters were reviewed, and registration/match regions were reviewed to ensure data quality. A final vertical accuracy check of the boresighted flight lines was completed against the surveyed check points after the z correction to ensure the requirement of NVA = 19.6 cm 95% Confidence Level was met. Point classification was performed according to USGS Lidar Base Specification 2022 Rev A. Bare earth DEMs were exported from the classified point cloud. Synthetic points generated by CZMIL refraction correction algorithms are present in this dataset. Please see the final project report for more details on the synthetic points. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2023-10-10 00:00:00 |
Process Contact: | National Geodetic Survey (NGS) |
Process Step 3
Description: |
Dewberry used algorithms in TerraScan to create the initial ground/submerged topography surface. Dewberry used rasterized aggregate extents of refracted points to create automated 2-D breaklines with LAStools and ArcGIS. Light travels at different speeds in air versus water and its speed and direction of travel change when it enters the water column. The refraction correction process accounts for this difference by adjusting the depth (distance traveled) and horizontal position (change of angle/direction) of the lidar points acquired within water. These breaklines delineate areas where the refraction correction was applied to the lidar data by CZMIL's automated refraction correction software based on the software's detection of water. The class 42 synthetic surface is generated by the software as a reference surface from which to perform the correction. Dewberry used the 2-D refraction extents and additional bathy features to classify the bathymetric bottom and ground points properly in TerraScan. Synthetically generated class 42 (synthetic water surface) points were flagged using the synthetic bit. The withheld bit was set on class 7 and class 18 in TerraScan after all classification was complete. All lidar data was peer-reviewed. Dewberry's QAQC also included creating void polygons for use during review. All necessary edits were applied to the dataset. LASTools software was used to update LAS header information, including all projection and coordinate reference system information. The final lidar data are in LAS format 1.4 and point data record format 6. All data was then verified by an Independent QC department within Dewberry. The independent QC was performed by separate analysts who did not perform manual classification or editing. The independent QC involved quantitative and qualitative reviews. |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2023-10-11 00:00:00 |
Process Contact: | National Geodetic Survey (NGS) |
Process Step 4
Description: |
The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) received files in laz format. The files contained lidar elevation and intensity measurements from the Big Bend Wildlife Management Area. The data were in UTM Zone 17 coordinates and ellipsoid elevations in meters. OCM performed the following processing on the data for Digital Coast storage and provisioning purposes: 1. Converted from UTM Zone 18 to geographic coordinates 2. Sorted by gps time |
---|---|
Process Date/Time: | 2024-07-30 00:00:00 |
Process Contact: | Office for Coastal Management (OCM) |
Child Items
Rubric scores updated every 15m
Type | Title | |
---|---|---|
Entity | NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar Class Scheme: Big Bend WMA, FL |
Catalog Details
Catalog Item ID: | 73046 |
---|---|
GUID: | gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:73046 |
Metadata Record Created By: | Maryellen Sault |
Metadata Record Created: | 2024-07-05 14:00+0000 |
Metadata Record Last Modified By: | Blake Waring |
Metadata Record Last Modified: | 2024-07-10 18:38+0000 |
Metadata Record Published: | 2024-07-10 |
Owner Org: | NGS |
Metadata Publication Status: | Published Externally |
Do Not Publish?: | N |
Metadata Last Review Date: | 2022-04-11 |
Metadata Review Frequency: | 3 Years |
Metadata Next Review Date: | 2025-04-11 |